PLASMAPHERESIS VERSUS INTRAVENOUS IMMUNOGLOBULINS IN GUILLAIN BARRE SYNDROME, THE THERAPEUTIC OUTCOMES

Guillain Barre Syndrome, the Therapeutic Outcomes

Authors

  • Syed Parvez Asghar Combined Military Hospital Rawalpindi
  • Humera Mubarik Jinnah Post Graduate Medical centre Karachi Pakistan
  • Nadia Shams Sir Syed College of Medical Sciences and Hospital Karachi Pakistan
  • Muhammad Babar Cheema Hope Clinic Peshawar Road Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Shahnaz Shah Jinnah Post Graduate Medical centre Karachi Pakistan

Keywords:

Guillain Barre syndrome, Intravenous immunoglobulins, Plasmapheresis

Abstract

Objective: To compare the therapeutic outcomes of plasmapheresis with intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) for Guillain Barre syndrome.

Study Design: Randomized controlled trial.

Place and Duration of Study: Medicine department; PNS Shifa Hospital Karachi from Jan 2011 to Jun 2012.

Patients and Methods: Adult patients admitted to internal medicine department with the diagnosis of Guillain Barre Syndrome (GBS) fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included after taking ethical approval and informed consent. They were randomly assigned to plasmapheresis and IVIG treatment groups. Their presenting features, investigations and management plan were followed over 6 months duration. Hughes disability scale for Guillain Barre syndrome was documented and compared at admission, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 6 months by non-parametric tests via SPSS version 17.

Results: Total 36 patients (31 males & 5 females) were included. Mean age was 37 ± 15 (18-70) years, mean duration of symptoms 11.6 ± 12.7 days. Plasmapheresis and IVIG groups were comparable with respect to age and gender (p>0.05). Significant improvement of mean disability score was observed in each group from baseline score (p<0.0005). At specified intervals, comparison between the two groups in terms of mean improvement in disability scores showed significant improvement at 4 weeks (p<0.05) in IVIG group as compared to plasmapheresis group; however on further observation at 12 weeks and 6 months, mean improvement was comparable between two groups with no significant difference (p>0.05). There was no significant difference in need for assisted ventilation between two groups (p>0.05). Variants of GBS observed were AIDP (50%), AMAN (31%) and AMSAN (19%).

Conclusion: Our study suggests that both plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulins are useful and effective modes of treatment for Guillain Barre Syndrome. Significant short term improvement was observed in the IVIG group at 4 weeks of treatment; however no significant difference in therapeutic outcome observed between the two groups on further follow up of 6 months. Thus focusing the need of further large scale regional studies to analyze various factors contributing to this short term but significant improvement with IVIG treatment observed in this study.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

31-08-2015

How to Cite

Asghar, S. P., Mubarik, H., Shams, N., Cheema, M. B., & Shah, S. (2015). PLASMAPHERESIS VERSUS INTRAVENOUS IMMUNOGLOBULINS IN GUILLAIN BARRE SYNDROME, THE THERAPEUTIC OUTCOMES: Guillain Barre Syndrome, the Therapeutic Outcomes. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, 65(4), 524–529. Retrieved from https://www.pafmj.org/PAFMJ/article/view/1004

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)