Comparison of Different Doses of Dexmedetomidine in Attenuating Extubation Response in Patients with Hypertension Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Authors

  • Osama Abdul Mateen Department of Anesthesia, Combined Military Hospital/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS), Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Muhammad Huzaifa Shareef Department of Anesthesia, Combined Military Hospital/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS), Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Mirza Hamid Beg Department of Anesthesia, Combined Military Hospital/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS), Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Taimur Azam Khan Department of Anesthesia, Combined Military Hospital/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS), Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Mudassar Iqbal Department of Anesthesia, Combined Military Hospital/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS), Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Junaid Zafar Department of Anesthesia, Combined Military Hospital/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS), Rawalpindi Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v76i6.10351

Keywords:

Cholecystectomy, Dexmedetomidine, Extubation, Hypertensive, Laparoscopic

Abstract

Objective: To compare different doses of dexmedetomidine in attenuating extubation response in hypertensive patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Study Design: Quasi-experimental study.

Place and Duration of Study: Department of Anesthesia, Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi Pakistan, from Sep 2022 to Feb 2023.

Methodology: Patients were segregated into two groups D1 (n=90) and D2 (n=90). Group-D1 received 0.5 mcg/kg of Dexmedetomidine in 10 ml of normal saline while Group-D2 received 1 mcg/kg of Dexmedetomidine diluted in normal saline (10 ml). Both the titrations were administered as an infusion over 10 minutes before extubation.

Results: Post-extubation mean heart rate varied from 86.27±3.48 beats per minute in the D1 versus 66.01±1.69 beats per minute in the Group-D2 (p<0.001). Similarly, mean arterial pressure varied from 97.40±1.23 mmHg in D1 to 80.88±1.77 mmHg in the Group-D2 (p<0.001). The quality of extubation was statistically better in the Group-D2 (p<0.001)

Conclusion: We conclude that 1 mcg/kg of Dexmedetomidine is a better dose than 0.5 mcg/kg in blunting extubation responses and providing more than satisfactory control of bradycardia and hypotension which is advantageous during extubation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Benham-Hermetz J, Mitchell V. Safe tracheal extubation after general anaesthesia. BJA educ 2021; 21(12): 446-454.

https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.bjae.2021.07.003

2. Saeed F, Lasrado S. Extubation. StatPearls [Internet]: StatPearls Publishing; 2021.

3. Dobson GP. Trauma of major surgery: a global problem that is not going away.Int J Surg 2020; 81: 47-54.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.07.017

4. Yong J, Fernando J. Incidence and complications of endotracheal intubation in a queensland regional intensive care unit. Australian Crit Care 2020; 33: S36-S37.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2020.04.116

5. Anam MA, Mollick M, Ahmed F, Rahman A, Rahman MM, Manjari M. Hemodynamic changes during traditional awake extubation and extubation using LMA supreme in controlled hypertensive patients. East Afr Scholars J Med Sci 2022; 5(5): 143-147.

6. Smith W, Whitlock EL. Cardiac surgery, ICU sedation, and delirium: is dexmedetomidine the silver bullet? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2023; 36(1): 50-56.

https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001207

7. Buckley MS, Smithburger PL, Wong A, Fraser GL, Reade MC, Klein-Fedyshin M, et al. Dexmedetomidine for facilitating mechanical ventilation extubation in difficult-to-wean ICU patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Intensive Care Med 2021; 36(8): 925-936.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066620937673

8. Singha D, Thakur A, Guleria A, Chaudhary V, Singh J, Sharma A. Comparing different doses of dexmedetomidine in attenuating extubation response in chronic smokers undergoing total extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized prospective study. Ain-Shams J Anesthesiol 2022; 14(1): 1-9.

9. Agarwal M, Malliwal A. Effect of dexmedetomidine on hemodynamic responses during tracheal extubation. Indian J Clin Anaesth 2019; 6(1): 23-29.

https://doi.org/10.18231/2394-4994.2019.0006

10. Solmaz Fa, Kirdemir P. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and anesthesia. Acta Medica Alanya 2020; 4(1): 95-101.

https://doi.org/10.30565/medalanya.587027

11. Hassanin AA, Ali NS, Elhiny MM. Effect of dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl on recovery responses to tracheal extubation in vitrectomy, randomized, controlled trial. Egypt J Anaesth 2023; 39(1): 40-49. https://doi.org/10.30565/medalanya.5870897

12. Lee S. Dexmedetomidine: present and future directions. Korean J Anesthesiol 2019; 72(4): 323-330.

https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.19259

13. Wang Y-Q, Zhang X-J, Wang Y. Effect of intrathecal dexmedetomidine on cesarean section during spinal anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Drug Des Devel Ther 2019; 13: 2933-2939. https://doi.org/10.2147/dddt.s207812

14. Fasil F, Saundattikar G, Jawale RH. Study of Hemodynamic Effects of Preoperative Single-Bolus Dexmedetomidine in Elective Laparoscopic Surgeries. J Pharmacol Pharmacother 2022; 13(1): 85-91. https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.19259

15. Branstetter JW, Ohman KL, Johnson DW, Gilbert BW. Management of paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity with dexmedetomidine and propranolol following traumatic brain injury in a pediatric patient. J Pediatr Intensive Care 2020; 9(01): 64-69.

https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1698758

16. Motlagh SD, Rokhtabnak F, Ghodraty MR, Delarestaghi MM, Saadat S, Araghi Z. Effect of different loading doses of dexmedetomidine on controlled hypotension and the incidence of bradycardia during rhinoplasty: a clinical trial. Anesthes Pain Med 2021; 11(4): e118857. https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.118857

17. Begum U, Singh PR, Naithani B, Singh V, Singh G, Tiwari T. Dexmedetomidine as bolus or low-dose infusion for the prevention of emergence agitation with sevoflurane anesthesia in pediatric patients. Anesth Essays Res 2019; 13(1): 57.

https://doi.org/10.4103%2Faer.AER_177_18

18. Sameen Z, Talib K, Wani SQ, Ashraf M, Nengroo SH. Preoperative education improves the preparedness for extubation at emergence from general anaesthesia. J Perioper Pract 2022; 32(3): 41-46.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1750458920936213

19. Jafarzadeh E, Modir H, Moshiri E, Barsari FZ, Almasi-Hashiani A. Comparison of dexmedetomidine, lidocaine, magnesium sulfate, and remifentanil in cough suppression during endotracheal extubation: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Bali J Anesthesiol 2022; 6(3): 171.

https://doi.org/10.4103/bjoa.bjoa_47_22

20. Shamim K, Anum L, Irfan A, Misbah S, Moomal Z, Madiha M. Use of dexmedetomidine in intubated and non-intubated patients of critical care and its outcome. Trends Anaesth Crit Care 2020; 35: 51-54.

https://doi.org/10.4103%2Faer.AER_177_18

Downloads

Published

30-10-2026

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

1.
Mateen OA, Shareef MH, Beg MH, Khan TA, Iqbal M, Zafar J. Comparison of Different Doses of Dexmedetomidine in Attenuating Extubation Response in Patients with Hypertension Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Pak Armed Forces Med J [Internet]. 2026 Oct. 30 [cited 2026 Oct. 30];76(6):770-4. Available from: https://www.pafmj.org/PAFMJ/article/view/10351