Achieving Predictable Success with Minimal Morbidity: Analysis of the Indirect Sinus Lift Technique for Maxillary Dentally Implant Placement

Authors

  • Shafi Ullah Khan Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry/ National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Adnan Babar Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry/ National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Ali Akhtar Khan Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry/ National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Muhammad Ishaq Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry/ National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Shahid Iqbal Khan Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry/ National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Idrees Khan Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry/ National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v74iSUPPL-2.11673

Keywords:

Indirect sinus lift, Maxillary implants, minimally invasive procedure, Osseointegration, Sinus lift

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the efficacy of indirect sinus lift procedure for maxillary dental implant placement.
Study Design: Prospective analytical study.
Place and Duration of Study: 28 Military Dental Centre/ Combined Military Hospital Rawalpindi Lahore, from May 2021 to
April 2023.
Methodology: The study included 50 consecutive patients of 40 to 65 years of age presenting with missing upper maxillary
molar teeth with maxillary sinus extension in the alveolar ridge and requiring maxillary dental implant placement. Indirect
sinus lift and bone augmentation was carried out through the osteotomy site with concurrent dental implant placement in all
patients.
Results: Out of 50 patients 49(98%) have successful osseointegration of dental implant at 4 months follow-up without any
sinus complications. The mean procedure time was 25.00+5.00 minutes including osteotomy, bone graft and implant
placement.
Conclusion: Elevating maxillary sinus floor presents a crucial step in achieving optimal bone volume for dental implant
placement. Performed meticulously, indirect sinus lift technique is minimally invasive alternative to overcome the surgical
complications and risks involved with direct open surgical approach.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Khehra, A.; Levin, L. Maxillary sinus augmentation procedures: A

narrative clinical review. Quintessence Int. 2020, 51, 578–584.

https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a44632

2. Hashem AH, Khedr MF, Hosny MM, Al-Destawy MT, Hashem MI. Effect

of Different Crestal Sinus Lift Techniques for Implant Placement in the

Posterior Maxilla of Deficient Height: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Appl.

Sci. 2023, 13 11 , 6668; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13116668

3. Mertens, C.; Meyer-Bäumer, A.; Kappel, H.; Hoffmann, J.; Steveling, H.G.

Use of 8-Mm and 9-Mm Implants in Atrophic Alveolar Ridges: 10-Year

Results. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2012, 27, 1501–1508. PMID:

23189302

4. Morand, M.; Irinakis, T. The Challenge of Implant Therapy in the

Posterior Maxilla: Providing a Rationale for the Use of Short Implants. J.

Oral Implant. 2007, 33, 257–266.

https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-13362007 33[257:TCOITI]2.0.CO;2

5. Huang, H.; Wu, G.; Hunziker, E. The Clinical Significance of Implant

Stability Quotient Isq Measurements: A Literature Review. J. Oral Biol.

Craniofac. Res. 2020, 10, 629–638.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.07.004

6. Ahmed Mohamed, B.; Mohamed Mohamed, B.; Akram Abbass, A.-A.;

Mahmoud Taha, E.-D.; Mostafa Mohamed, H. Clinical and Radiographic

Evaluation of Crestal Ridge Splitting Versus Osseodensification

Techniques for Dental Implant Placement into the Narrow Alveolar

Ridge. J. Int. Dent. Med. Res. 2022, 15, 205–211.

7. Rodoni, L.R.; Glauser, R.; Feloutzis, A.; Hämmerle, C.H. Implants in the

Posterior Maxilla: A Comparative Clinical and Radiologic Study. Int. J.

Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2005, 20, 231–237.

8. Andreucci CA, Fonseca EMM, Jorge RN. A New Simplified Autogenous

Sinus Lift Technique.Bioengineering 2023,10 5 ,505;

https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10050505

9. Atiq T, Iqbal S, Rashid W, Ain QT, Asghar I, Javed T. Comparison of

Implant Success Rate Between Direct And Indirect Sinus Lift

Procedure.AnnPakInstMedSci.2022; 18 4 :

295299.DOI:https://doi.org/10.48036/apims.v18i4.761

10. Rahate, P.S.; Kolte, R.A.; Kolte, A.P.; Bodhare, G.H.; Lathiya, V.N. Efficacy

of simultaneous placement of dental implants in osteotome-mediated

sinus floor elevation with and without bone augmentation: A systematic

review and meta-analysis. J. Indian Soc. Periodontol. 2023, 27, 31–39.

doi:10.4103/jisp.jisp_196_21

11. Nasr, S.; Slot, D.E.; Bahaa, S.; Dörfer, C.E.; Fawzy El-Sayed, K.M. Dental

implants combined with sinus augmentation: What is the merit of bone

grafting? A systematic review. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 2016, 44, 1607–

1617.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2016.06.022

12. Del Fabbro, M.; Corbella, S.; Weinstein, T.; Ceresoli, V.; Taschieri, S.

Implant survival rates after osteotome-mediated maxillary sinus

augmentation: A systematic review. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 2012,

14 Suppl. 1 , e159–e168.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00399.x

13. Krennmair, S.; Hunger, S.; Forstner, T.; Malek, M.; Krennmair, G.;

Stimmelmayr, M. Implant health and factors affecting peri-implant

marginal bone alteration for implants placed in staged maxillary sinus

augmentation: A 5-year prospective study. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res.

2019, 21, 32–41.

https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12684

14. Jamcoski, V.H.; Faot, F.; Marcello-Machado, R.M.; Melo, A.C.M.; Fontão,

F.N.G.K. 15-Year Retrospective Study on the Success Rate of Maxillary

Sinus Augmentation and Implants: Influence of Bone Substitute Type,

Presurgical Bone Height, and Membrane Perforation during Sinus Lift.

Biomed. Res. Int. 2023, 2023, 9144661.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9144661

15. Giovannetti, F.; Raponi, I.; Priore, P.; Macciocchi, A.; Barbera, G.;

Valentini, V. Minimally-Invasive Endoscopic-Assisted Sinus

Augmentation. J. Craniofac. Surg. 2019, 30, e359–e362.

https://journals.lww.com/jcraniofacialsurgery/toc/2019/06000

16. Johansson, L.A.; Isaksson, S.; Lindh, C.; Becktor, J.P.; Sennerby, L.

Maxillary sinus floor augmentation and simultaneous implant placement

using locally harvested autogenous bone chips and bone debris: A

prospective clinical study. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2010, 68, 837–844.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.093

17. Beck-Broichsitter, B.E.; Gerle, M.; Wiltfang, J.; Becker, S.T. Perforation of

the Schneiderian membrane during sinus floor elevation: A risk factor for

long-term success of dental implants? Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2020, 24,

151–156.

18. Gandhi, Y. Sinus Grafts: Science and Techniques—Then and Now. J.

Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 2017, 16, 135–144.

19. Aruna Wimalarathna. Indirect Sinus Lift: An Overview of Different

Techniques. Biomed J Sci & Tech Res 33 4 - 2021.

BJSTR. MS.ID.005447.

DOI:10.26717/BJSTR.2021.33.005447

Downloads

Published

30-09-2024

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Categories

How to Cite

1.
Khan SU, Babar A, Khan AA, Ishaq M, Khan SI, Khan I. Achieving Predictable Success with Minimal Morbidity: Analysis of the Indirect Sinus Lift Technique for Maxillary Dentally Implant Placement. Pak Armed Forces Med J [Internet]. 2024 Sep. 30 [cited 2026 Jan. 17];74(SUPPL-2):S320-S323. Available from: https://www.pafmj.org/PAFMJ/article/view/11673