Comparison of Thoracic Epidural Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block for Post-Operative Pain Relief in Thoracotomies

Sikander Hayat; Ameer Yasser Zaid; Muhammad Rashid Iqbal; Ghulam Sabir; Mudassar Iqbal; Syed Ali Mazhar Rizvi

doi:10.51253/pafmj.v76i3.11726

Authors

Sikander Hayat Department of Anesthesia, Combined Military Hospital/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS), Rawalpindi Pakistan
Ameer Yasser Zaid Department of Anesthesia, Combined Military Hospital/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS), Rawalpindi Pakistan
Muhammad Rashid Iqbal Department of Anesthesia, Combined Military Hospital/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS), Rawalpindi Pakistan
Ghulam Sabir Department of Anesthesia, Combined Military Hospital/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS), Rawalpindi Pakistan
Mudassar Iqbal Department of Anesthesia, Combined Military Hospital/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS), Rawalpindi Pakistan
Syed Ali Mazhar Rizvi Department of Anesthesia, Pak Emirates Military Hospital/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS), Rawalpindi Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v76i3.11726

Keywords:

Analgesia, Block, Epidural, Erector Spinae, Thoracic, Thoracotomies

Abstract

Objective: To Compare post-operative analgesic effectiveness of thoracic epidural block with erector spinae plane block in patients with thoracotomies.

Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial (IRCT20231113060036N1).

Place and Duration of Study: Department of Anesthesia, Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi Pakistan, from Jul to Dec 2023.

Methodology: The patients were divided into the thoracic epidural block group (Group-T) (n=20) and the erector spinae block group (Group-E) (n=20). Primary variables measured were mean time to first rescue analgesia, total dose of intravenous analgesia needed in 24 hours and median pain scores at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 hours and patient satisfaction for pain relief on the Likert scale 24 hours after intervention.

Results: Mean time for first dose of added rescue analgesia was 178.15±10.51 minutes in Group-T versus 320.35±15.23 minutes in Group-E (p<0.001). Total added intravenous analgesia post-surgery in 24 hours was 14.45±1.09 mg in Group-T versus 10.15±1.26 mg in Group-E (p<0.001). When assessed after 3-hours post-surgery, median scores were 5.00 (IQR=0.00) in Group-T versus 3.00 (IQR=0.00) in Group-E (p<0.001).

Conclusion: The Erector Spinae Plain Block provides effective and comparable analgesia compared to Thoracic Epidural Block with less opioid requirement and a better adverse effect profile.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Gupta R, Van de Ven T, Pyati S. Post-thoracotomy pain: current strategies for prevention and treatment. Drugs 2020; 80: 1677-1684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-020-01390-0

2. Maloney J, Wie C, Pew S, Covington S, Maita M, Kozinn R, et al. Post-thoracotomy Pain Syndrome. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2022; 26(9): 677-681.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-022-01069-z

3. Harbell MW, Langley NR, Seamans DP, Kraus MB, Carey FJ, Craner RC. Deep parasternal intercostal plane nerve block: an anatomical study. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2024; 49(3): 179-183.

https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2023-104716

4. Guerra-Londono CE, Privorotskiy A, Cozowicz C, Hicklen RS, Memtsoudis SG, Mariano ER, et al. Assessment of Intercostal Nerve Block Analgesia for Thoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4(11): e2133394.

https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.33394

5. Rispoli M, Tamburri R, Nespoli MR, Esposito M, Mattiacci DM, Santonastaso DP, et al. Erector spine plane block as postoperative rescue analgesia in thoracic surgery. Tumori J 2020; 106(5): 388-391.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0300891620915783

6. Wan W, Hou Z, Qiu Q. Postoperative analgesic effect of dexmedetomidine combined with TPVB applied to open gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol 2023; 45(2): 234-239.

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1695204/v1

7. Manassero A, Bossolasco M, Carrega M, Coletta G. Postoperative thoracic epidural analgesia: adverse events from a single-center series of 3126 patients. Local Region Anesth 2020; 13: 111-119. https://doi.org/10.2147/lra.s272410

8. de Oliveira CA, Vanetti TK, Braghiroli KS. Complications of intercostal blocks and ablations. In: Erdine S, Staats PS, editors. Complications of pain-relieving procedures: an illustrated guide. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2022. Chapter 29 p. 223-226.

https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119757306.ch29

9. Hadzic A. NYSORA Nerve Block Manual: NYSORA Inc.; 2022.

10. Begum MR, Hossain MA. Validity and reliability of visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain measurement. J Med Case Rep Rev 2019; 2(11): 394-402.

11. Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The erector spinae plane block: a novel analgesic technique in thoracic neuropathic pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2016; 41(5): 621-627.

https://doi.org/10.1097/aap.0000000000000451

12. Chin KJ, Adhikary SD, Forero M. Erector spinae plane (ESP) block: a new paradigm in regional anesthesia and analgesia. Curr Anesthesiol Rep 2019; 9: 271-280.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40140-019-00333-0e

13. Forero M. Erector spinae plane block: RIP or VIP? Reg Anesth Pain Med 2021; 46(9): 836-837.

https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2020-102160

14. Pennefather SH, Quarterman CP-J, Klinger RY, Kanellakos GW. Pain management after thoracic surgery. Principles and practice of anesthesia for thoracic surgery. 2nd edition. Springer 2019: 981-1027.

15. Elsabeeny WY, Ibrahim MA, Shehab NN, Mohamed A, Wadod MA. Serratus anterior plane block and erector spinae plane block versus thoracic epidural analgesia for perioperative thoracotomy pain control: a randomized controlled study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2021; 35(10): 2928-2936.

https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2020.12.047

16. Jinn CK, Kariem E-B. Mechanisms of action of the erector spinae plane (ESP) block: a narrative review. Can J Anesth 2021; 68(3): 387-408.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-020-01875-2

17. van den Broek R, Koopman J, Postema J, Verberkmoes N, Chin K, Bouwman R, et al. Continuous erector spinae plane block versus thoracic epidural analgesia in video-assisted thoracic surgery: a study protocol for a prospective randomized open label non-inferiority trial. Trials 2021; 22(1): 1-13.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05275-9

18. Kukreja P, Herberg TJ, Johnson BM, Kofskey AM, Short RT, MacBeth L, et al. Retrospective Case Series Comparing the Efficacy of Thoracic Epidural With Continuous Paravertebral and Erector Spinae Plane Blocks for Postoperative Analgesia After Thoracic Surgery. Cureus 2021; 13(10): e18533.

https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18533

19. Singh S, Avinash R, Jaiswal S, Kumari A. Comparison of safety and efficacy of thoracic epidural block and erector spinae plane block for analgesia in patients with multiple rib fractures: A pilot single-blinded, randomised controlled trial. Indian J Anaesth 2023; 67(7): 614-619.

https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_844_21

20. Diwan SM, Adhye B, Nair A, Sancheti P. Comparison of thoracic epidural and thoracic erector spinae plane block for pain relief of posterolateral rib fractures—a retrospective cohort study. Ain-Shams J Anesthesiol 2022; 14(1): 1-6.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s42077-022-00287-2