Evaluation of the Cerebro-Placental Ratio and Doppler Indices of the Umbilical and Middle Cerebral Arteries at 27-40 Weeks of Normal Gestation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v76i1.12263Keywords:
Doppler Velocimetry, Foetal Monitoring, Middle Cerebral ArteryAbstract
Objective: To measure the Pulsatility Index (PI) and Resistive Index (RI) in the Umbilical Artery (UA) and the Middle Cerebral Artery (MCA) between 27-40 weeks of a normal intrauterine pregnancy, and to calculate the Cerebro-Placental (CP) ratio for all patients.
Study Design: Cross-sectional study.
Place and Duration of Study: Tertiary Care Hospital of Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from Jun 22 to Mar 23.
Methodology: This study included the females with normal third-trimester pregnancies from 27 weeks, excluding anomalies, multiple pregnancies, maternal smoking, documented complications, and pre-existing medical conditions. Duplex Doppler measured middle cerebral artery (MCA) and umbilical artery (UA) indices, and the CP ratio. SPSS Version 23:00 was used for data analysis.
Results: In this study, 183 pregnant females were considered, with a predominant age range of 26-30 years (40.4%). The mean age was 28.60±5.01 years, and the mean gestational age was 34.21±2.91 weeks. Maximum patient frequency occurred in the 34th week of gestation (13.6%). Strong, negative correlation between CP ratio and UA pulsatility index was observed for nearly every gestation week (p<0.05).
Conclusion: The study identifies distinct gestational age-related patterns in foetal middle cerebral artery (MCA) and umbilical artery (UA) Doppler indices. The CP ratio emerges as a valuable parameter, showcasing potential application, particularly in intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) cases.
Downloads
References
1. Pritsivelis, Cristos & Braga, Jair & Rezende-Filho, Jorge. (2022). Doppler Velocimetry pp 295-302.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83434-0_16
2. Mari G. Doppler ultrasonography in obstetrics: from the diagnosis of foetal anaemia to the treatment of intrauterine growth-restricted foetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200(6): 613.e1-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.10.054
3. Fitz Gerald DE, Drumm JE. Non-invasive measurement of human foetal circulation using ultrasound: a new method. Br Med J 1977; 2(6100): 1450–1451.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.6100.1450
4. Maulik D, Mundy D, Heitmann E, Maulik D. Umbilical artery Doppler in the assessment of foetal growth restriction. Clin Perinatol 2011; 38(1): 65–82.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2010.12.004
5. Opheim GL, Zucknick M, Henriksen T, Haugen G. A maternal meal affects clinical Doppler parameters in the foetal middle cerebral artery. PLoS One 2018; 13(12): e0209990.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209990
6. Bornstein E, Chervenak FA. Ultrasound Doppler waveform assessment: the story continues. J Perinat Med 2019; 47(2): 139–141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2018-0387
7. Oakes MC, O’Donnell CM, Zhang F, Bruno AM, Rosenbloom JI, Raghuraman N et al. Performance of middle cerebral artery doppler for prediction of recurrent foetal anaemia. J Matern Foetal Neonatal Med 2022; 35(25): 8226–8232.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2021.1967316
8. Oros D, Ruiz-Martinez S, Staines-Urias E, Conde-Agudelo A, Villar J, Fabre E, et al. Reference ranges for Doppler indices of umbilical and foetal middle cerebral arteries and cerebroplacental ratio: systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 53(4): 454–464.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.20102
9. Contro E, Cataneo I, Morano D, Farina A. Reference charts for umbilical Doppler pulsatility index in foetuses with isolated two-vessel cord. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2019; 299(4): 947–951.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05086-z
10. Zhou P, Sun Y, Tan Y, An Y, Wang X, Wang L. Fetal and Neonatal Middle Cerebral Artery Hemodynamic Changes and Significance under Ultrasound Detection in Hypertensive Disorder Complicating Pregnancy Patients with Different Severities. Comput Math Methods Med 2022; 2022: 6110228.
https://doi:10.1155/2022/6110228
11. Rashmi L, Bhattacharjee A. Umbilical artery Doppler indices in relation to foetal outcome in high risk pregnancy. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2018; 7(2): 628–635.
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20180184
12. Kirlangiç MM, Çevi̇k M, Sade OS, Üner D, Eraslan Şahi̇n M. Cerebroplacental ratio during the third trimester of pregnancy: A prospective case-control study. Bezmialem Sci 2023; 11(2): 170–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.14235/bas.galenos.2022.48343
13. Perkovic-Kepeci S, Cirkovic A, Milic N, Dugalic S, Stanisavljevic D, Milincic M, et al. Doppler Indices of the Uterine, Umbilical, and Fetal Middle Cerebral Artery in Diabetic versus Non-Diabetic Pregnancy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicina 2023; 59(8): 1502.
https://doi:10.3390/medicina59081502
14. Wang Q, Wang L, Hu M, Yang S, Zhang W, Chen H, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of fetal renal ultrasound parameters for fetal growth restriction. Heliyon 2024; 10(17): e36687.
https://doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36687
15. Karabay G, Seyhanli Z, Cakir BT, Aktemur G, Sucu ST, Tonyali NV, et al. Relationship Between Adverse Neonatal Outcomes and Diastolic Deceleration Area on Fetal MCA Doppler in Patients with Late Fetal Growth Restriction. Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul 2025; 59(1): 119-126.
https://doi:10.14744/SEMB.2025.73368
16. Srikumar S, Debnath J, Ravikumar R, Bandhu HC, Maurya VK. Doppler indices of the umbilical and foetal middle cerebral artery at 18-40 weeks of normal gestation: A pilot study. Med J Armed Forces India 2017; 73(3): 232–41.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2016.12.008
17. Kale RM, Tirupathi RG, Sheela SR. Role of Ultrasonography and Color Doppler in the Assessment of High-Risk Pregnancies and Their Accuracy in Predicting Fetal Outcome. Cureus 2023; 15(5): e39017. https://doi:10.7759/cureus.39017
18. Hussein H, Megahed A, Midan MF. Evaluation of Sex Specific Circulatory Differences in Cerebroplacental Doppler Measurements. GJCR 2022; 9(1): 1–7.
https://doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2020-51948721/
19. Leavitt K, Odibo L, Nwabuobi C, Tuuli MG, Odibo A. The value of introducing cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) versus umbilical artery (UA) Doppler alone for the prediction of neonatal small for gestational age (SGA) and short-term adverse outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2021; 34(10): 1565-1569.
https://doi:10.1080/14767058.2019.1640206
20. Lv M, Yu S, Li Y, Zhang X, Zhao D. Ultrasound multiparametric assessment of the impact of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy on foetal cardiac function and growth and development. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022; 2022: 3419966.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3419966
21. Bhide A, Acharya G, Bilardo CM, Brezinka C, Cafici D, Hernandez-Andrade E, et al. ISUOG practice guidelines: use of Doppler ultrasonography in obstetrics: ISUOG Guidelines. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41(2): 233–239.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.12371
22. Beatriz A, Rita A, Rita A, Luís G. Fetal Aortic and Umbilical Doppler Flow Velocity Waveforms in Pregnancy: The Concept of Aortoumbilical Column. Curr Cardiol Rev 2024; 20(1): 1-4.
https://doi.org/10.2174/011573403X255256230919061018
23. Bonnevier A, Maršál K, Brodszki J, Thuring A, Källén K. Cerebroplacental ratio as predictor of adverse perinatal outcome in the third trimester. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021; 100(3): 497–503.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Quratulain Malik, Nisar Ahmed, Muhammad Zeeshan Ali, Saira Ahmed, Ahmad Zafar Baig, Muhammad Humayyun Javed

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.





