Assessment of Corneal Endothelial Cell Density in Patients with Dry Eye Disease

Authors

  • Mishail Saadat Department of Ophthalmology, Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS), Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Waqar Muzaffar Department of Ophthalmology, Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS), Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Shagufta Perveen Department of Ophthalmology, Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS), Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Muhammad Wasif Saleem Department of Ophthalmology, Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS), Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Muhammad Babar Bashir Department of Ophthalmology, Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS), Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Zohaib Hassan Malik Department of Ophthalmology, Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS), Rawalpindi Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v76iSUPPL-5.13163

Keywords:

Cornea, Dry Eye Disease, Eye, Tear Film, Xerophthalmia

Abstract

Objective: To compare cell density of corneal endothelial cells in patients with dry eye disease versus controls.

Study Design: Case-control study.

Place and Duration of Study: Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology, Rawalpindi Pakistan, from Jul to Dec 2024.

Methodology: After permission of the ethical committee, the corneal topographic measurements of thirty-five patients with dry eyes (Group-A) were compared to age and gender matched controls (Group-B). The diagnosis of dry eye was established on tear break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer test and ocular surface disease index (OSDI) as part of comprehensive ophthalmic evaluation. Density of corneal endothelium, central corneal thickness and hexagonality of cells was recorded and compared between groups along with demographics.

Results: The primary outcome was endothelial cell density of cornea. The corneal endothelial cell density in Group-A patients was 2294.94±242.03 cells per mm2 and corneal endothelial density in Group-B patients was 2949.62±375.8 cells per mm2 (p<0.001). The central corneal thickness was 517.80±6.30 um in Group-A and 544.88±16.76 um in Group-B (p<0.001). The epithelial cell hexagonality was 64.17±9.90 in Group-A and 68.77±4.80 in Group-B (p=0.017). 

Conclusion: We concluded that patients with dry eyes have reduced density of corneal endothelial cells along with reduced central thickness of cornea, cell hexagonality and best corrected visual acuity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. McCann P, Abraham AG, Mukhopadhyay A, Panagiotopoulou K, Chen H, Rittiphairoj T, et al Prevalence and incidence of dry eye and meibomian gland dysfunction in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Ophthalmol 2022; 140(12): 1181-1192.

https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.4394

2. Britten-Jones AC, Wang MT, Samuels I, Jennings C, Stapleton F, Craig JP. Epidemiology and Risk Factors of Dry Eye Disease: Considerations for Clinical Management. Medicina 2024; 60(9): 1458.

https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60091458

3. Ayub A, Akhtar FM, Saleem N, Ali MH, Ayub MH, Butt NH. Frequency and risk factors of dry eye disease in Pakistani population, a hospital based study. Pak J Ophthalmol 2017; 33(4). https://doi.org/10.36351/pjo.v33i4.26

4. Mamoon I, Ayub F, Sarwat S. Prevalence of dry eye disease among IT students in Pakistan. Int Ophthalmol 2024; 44: 204.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-024-03142-5

5. Shetty R, Sethu S, Deshmukh R, Deshpande K, Ghosh A, Agrawal A, et al. Corneal dendritic cell density is associated with subbasal nerve plexus features, ocular surface disease index, and serum vitamin D in evaporative dry eye disease. BioMed Res Int 2016; 2016(1): 4369750.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4369750

6. Hafeez T, Alvi K, Yousaf S, Ashraf MA, Shahid S, Hussain K. Correlation of corneal endothelial cell density in low, moderate, and higher myopes. Rawal Med J 2023; 48(4): 957-960.

7. Bhujel B, Oh SH, Kim CM, Yoon YJ, Chung HS, Ye EA. Current Advances in Regenerative Strategies for Dry Eye Diseases: A Comprehensive Review. Bioengineering 2023; 11(1): 39.

https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11010039

8. Price MO, Mehta JS, Jurkunas UV, Price Jr FW. Corneal endothelial dysfunction: Evolving understanding and treatment options. Prog Retin Eye Res 2021; 82: 100904.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2020.100904

9. Steen SS, Moawad EM, El Shabrawy M. Assessment of Corneal Endothelial Cell Density in Patients with Dry Eye Disease. Suez Canal Univ Med J 2023; 26(2): 55-63.

https://doi.org/10.21608/scumj.2023.304912

10. Humayun S, Noor M, Shahid M, Naqvi SA, Ishaq M, Humayun Q. Diagnosis of dry eye syndrome using ocular surface disease Index, tear film break-up time, and schirmer test. J. Coll. Physicians Surg Pak 2024; 34: 308-312.

https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2024.03.308

11. Wróbel-Dudzińska D, Osial N, Stępień PW, Gorecka A, Żarnowski T. Prevalence of Dry Eye Symptoms and Associated Risk Factors among University Students in Poland. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2023; 20(2): 1313.

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021313

12. Namwase S, Ruvuma S, Onyango J. Corneal endothelial cell density and associated factors among adults at a regional referral hospital in Uganda: a cross-sectional study. BMC Ophthalmol 2024; 24: 165.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-024-03435-4

13. Brott NR, Zeppieri M, Ronquillo Y. Schirmer test. InStatPearls [Internet] 2024. StatPearls Publishing. [Accessed on March 25 2024] Available from:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559159/

14. Karadayi K, Ciftci F, Akin T, Bilge AH. Increase in central corneal thickness in dry and normal eyes with application of artificial tears: a new diagnostic and follow-up criterion for dry eye. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2005; 25(6): 485-491.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.2005.00336.x

15. Salavat MC, Munteanu M, Chercotă V, Ardelean AI, Schuldez A, Dinu V. Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss Following Cataract Surgery in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Comprehensive Review. Biomedicines 2025; 13(7): 1726.

https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13071726

16. Kheirkhah A, Saboo US, Abud TB, Dohlman TH, Arnoldner MA, Hamrah P, et al. Reduced Corneal Endothelial Cell Density in Patients With Dry Eye Disease. Am J Ophthalmol 2015; 159(6): 1022-1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2015.03.011

17. Duman R, Çevik MT, Çevik SG, Duman R, Perente I. Corneal endothelial cell density in healthy Caucasian population. Saudi J Ophthalmol 2016; 30(4): 236-239.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjopt.2016.10.003

18. Islam QU, Saeed MK, Mehboob MA. Age related changes in corneal morphological characteristics of healthy Pakistani eyes. Saudi J Ophthalmol 2017; 31(2): 86-90.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjopt.2017.02.009

19. De Paiva CS, Leger AJ, Caspi RR. Mucosal immunology of the ocular surface. Mucosal Immunol 2022; 15: 1143–1157.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41385-022-00551-6

20. Vidal-Rohr M, Craig JP, Davies LN, Wolffsohn JS. The epidemiology of dry eye disease in the UK: The Aston dry eye study. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2023; 46(3): 101837.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2023.101837

Downloads

Published

28-05-2026

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Categories

How to Cite

1.
Saadat M, Muzaffar W, Perveen S, Saleem MW, Bashir MB, Malik ZH. Assessment of Corneal Endothelial Cell Density in Patients with Dry Eye Disease. Pak Armed Forces Med J [Internet]. 2026 May 28 [cited 2026 Jun. 7];76(SUPPL-5):S783-S787. Available from: https://www.pafmj.org/PAFMJ/article/view/13163