Correlation between Central Venous Pressure and Femoral Vein Diameter
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v76i2.13895Keywords:
Central Venous Pressure, Femoral Vein, UltrasoundAbstract
Objective: To determine the correlation between central venous pressure and femoral vein diameter.
Study Design: Cross sectional analytical study.
Place and Duration of Study: Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Combined Military Hospital (CMH), Rawalpindi Pakistan, from May to Sep, 2025.
Methodology: This study included 84 patients. Patients who were 18 years or older, on mechanical ventilation with central venous catheter passed in internal jugular or subclavian veins were included in study. Those with deep venous thrombosis, raised intraabdominal pressure were excluded. Central venous pressure (CVP) was measured with manual manometer technique and was recorded in ‘centimetres of water’ (cm H2O). Femoral vein diameter (FVD) was measured non-invasively with linear transducer below sapheno femoral junction and was recorded in ‘centimetres’ (cm). Both measurements were taken with patient in supine position and were recorded by two critical care medicine residents who were blinded to each other results.
Results: There was a moderate correlation between femoral vein diameter and central venous pressure (r=0.40, p<0.001). Regression result suggested that a 1cm increase in FVD was associated with a 5.32 cm increase in CVP and was significant at the 99%CI.
Conclusion: Considering a moderate correlation between central venous pressure and femoral vein diameter, FVD may be used as a marker for intravascular volume status however, further studies are needed.
Downloads
References
1. Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, Antonelli M, Coopersmith CM, French C, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med 2021; 49(11): 1063-143.
https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000005337
2. De Backer D, Aissaoui N, Cecconi M, Chew MS, Denault A, Hajjar L, et al. How can assessing hemodynamics help to assess volume status? Intensive Care Med 2022; 48(10): 1482-1494.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-022-06808-9
3. Gawalkar AA, Batta A. Ultrasound based estimate of central venous pressure: are we any closer? World J Cardiol 2024; 16(6): 310-313.
https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v16.i6.310
4. Hill B, Smith C. Central venous pressure monitoring in critical care settings. Br J Nurs 2021; 30(4): 230-236.
https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2021.30.4.230
5. Tolson OW. Should central venous pressure be used to guide critical care management? Br J Hosp Med 2022; 83(10): 1-3.
https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2022.0167
6. Begum M, Arshad AR, Hussain A, Khalid A. Is femoral vein diameter a reliable marker of central venous pressure? Life Sci 2023; 4(2): 4. https://doi.org/10.37185/LnS.1.1.272
7. Cho RJ, Williams DR, Leatherman JW. Measurement of femoral vein diameter by ultrasound to estimate central venous pressure. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2016; 13(1): 81-85.
https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201506-337BC
8. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007; 39(2): 175-191.
https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
9. Pfortmueller CA, Dabrowski W, Wise R, van Regenmortel N, Malbrain ML. Fluid accumulation syndrome in sepsis and septic shock: pathophysiology, relevance and treatment—a comprehensive review. Ann Intensive Care 2024; 14(1): 115.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-024-01336-9
10. Fernández-Sarmiento J, Sierra-Zuñiga MF, González MP, Lucena N, Lanziotti VS, Agudelo S. Association between fluid overload and mortality in children with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Paediatr Open 2023; 7(1): e002094.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002094
11. Ding X, Chen B. Effect of aggressive intravenous fluid resuscitation versus nonaggressive fluid resuscitation in the treatment of acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pancreas 2023; 52(2): e89-e100.
https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0000000000002230
12. Rodríguez-Moguel N, Osuna-Padilla IA, Piekarska KB, Negrete-García MF, Hernández-Muñoz A, Contreras-Marín JA, et al. Fluid status assessment in critically ill patients with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study. J Clin Med 2024; 13(2): 540.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13020540
13. Coutinho AL, Barbosa RH, Lopes MR, Tenório AP. Inferior vena cava ultrasound for assessing volume status and fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients: a systematic review. Arq Bras Cardiol: Imagem cardiovasc. 2021; 34(3): 193.
https://doi.org/10.47593/2675-312X/20213403eabc193
14. Di Nicolò P, Tavazzi G, Nannoni L, Corradi F. Inferior vena cava ultrasonography for volume status evaluation: an intriguing promise never fulfilled. J Clin Med 2023; 12(6): 2217.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062217
15. Singh DR, Thapa AS, Limbu Y, Pandey S, Shrestha S. Correlation of inferior vena cava diameter and IVC collapsibility index with central venous pressure (CVP) in critically ill surgical patients. J Soc Surg Nepal 2021; 24(1): 19-22.
https://doi.org/10.3126/jssn.v24i1.41005
16. Hakim DD, Meilyana F, Peryoga SU, Arniawati I, Wijaya EA, Martiano MR. Usefulness of non-invasive parameters (inferior vena cava diameter, inferior vena cava collapsibility, inferior vena cava-aortic ratio) for hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill children: a systematic review. Med Dev Evid Res 2024: 123-133.
https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S454849
17. Malik A, Akhtar A, Saadat S, Mansoor S. Predicting central venous pressure by measuring femoral venous diameter using ultrasonography. Cureus 2016; 8(11): e893.
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.893
18. Ma Z, Gai J, Sun Y, Bai Y, Cai H, Wu L, Sun L, et al. Measuring the ratio of femoral vein diameter to femoral artery diameter by ultrasound to estimate volume status. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2021; 21(1): 506.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02309-7
19. Zidan D, Baess A. Comparison between femoral vein diameter and inferior vena cava diameter by ultrasound in estimation of central venous pressure in mechanically ventilated patients. Res Opin Anesth Intensive Care 2020; 7(1): 100-103.
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Fatima Tassadaq Syed, Ahmed Mujadid Khan Burki, Sanum Kashif

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.





