Success Rate of Combined Transcanalicular Diode Laser and Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy in Patients of Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction

Authors

  • Ammarah Ashraf Awan Department of Ophthalmology, Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology, Rawalpindi/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Syeda Alishba Zahra Naqvi Department of Ophthalmology, Foundation University, Islamabad Pakistan
  • Aisha Rafique Department of Ophthalmology, Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology, Rawalpindi/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Ubaid Ullah Yasin Department of Ophthalmology, Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology, Rawalpindi/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Waqas Rahim Butt Department of Ophthalmology, Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology, Rawalpindi/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Syed Abid Hassan Naqvi Department of Ophthalmology, Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology, Rawalpindi/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v76iSUPPL-1.13929

Keywords:

Dacryocystorhinostomy, Endoscopy, Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction

Abstract

Objective: To determine the success rate of combined Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) and Transcanalicular Diode Laser DCR in patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Study Design: Analytical cross-sectional study.

Place and Duration of Study: Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology, Rawalpindi Pakistan, from March 2024 to Mar 2025.

Methodology: Patients presenting with epiphora and a positive regurgitation-on-pressure test were enrolled through convenience sampling. Pre-sac patency was assessed using lacrimal syringing, which confirmed complete nasolacrimal duct obstruction. All patients underwent combined Transcanalicular Diode Laser DCR and Endoscopic DCR performed as a simultaneous procedure. Outcomes were evaluated at a 6-month postoperative follow-up, assessing overall, anatomical, and functional success.

Results: A total of 150 patients were included, with a mean age of 54.9±9.8 years (range: 28–76 years). The overall success rate was 92.0%, while anatomical and functional success rates were 96.0% and 91.3%, respectively (p=0.016). Functional pathology was the leading cause of failure, and lid laxity (22.7%) was significantly associated with functional failure (23.5% vs 4.3%, p<0.01).

Conclusion: Combined Transcanalicular Diode Laser–Endoscopic DCR yielded high overall, anatomical, and functional success rates. Functional failure remained more common in patients with associated lid laxity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Harris S, Sweeney A, Yen M, Burkat C. Secondary Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction. EyeWiki [Internet]. [cited 12 Oct 2025]. Available from:

https://eyewiki.org/Secondary_Acquired_Nasolacrimal_Duct_Obstruction

2. Ullrich K, Malhotra R, Patel BC. Dacryocystorhinostomy. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025. [cited 12 Oct 2025]. Available from:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557851/

3. Yakopson V, Flanagan J, Ahn D, Luo B. Dacryocystorhinostomy: history, evolution and future directions. Saudi J Ophthalmol 2011; 25(1): 37–49.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjopt.2010.10.012

4. Locatello LG, DeZan ER, Tarantini A, Lanzetta P, Miani C. External dacryocystorhinostomy: a critical overview of current evidence. Eur J Ophthalmol 2024; 35(1): 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721241249214

5. Awais M, Naqvi SAH, Akram A, Shahid M. Transcanalicular diode laser assisted dacryocystorhinostomy: a breakthrough in acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Pak J Med Sci 2020; 36(4). https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.4.1906

6. Mansour HO, Elzaher HR, Tharwat E. Comparing the success rate of external DCR with anterior flap versus flap excision. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol 2023; 12(1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.51329/mehdiophthal1464

7. Różycki R, Skrzypiec Ł, Ulaszewska K. Effectiveness and factors influencing success of transcanalicular laser-assisted endoscopic DCR. Diagnostics 2024; 14(17): 1944.

https://doi.org/0.3390/diagnostics14171944

8. Evereklioglu C, Sener H, Polat OA. Success rate of external, endonasal, and transcanalicular laser DCR: network meta-analysis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2023; 261(12): 3369–3384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-023-06089-y

9. Rajabi MT, Shahraki K, Nozare A. External versus endoscopic DCR for primary acquired NLDO. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2022; 29(1): 1–6.

https://doi.org/10.4103/meajo.meajo_238_21

10. Torun MT, Demirel S, Buyuk M. The role of rhinostomy ostium size on functional success in DCR. J Ophthalmol 2022.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8287942

11. Wormald PJ. Powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Laryngoscope 2002; 112(1): 69–72.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200201000-00012

12. Sung YS, Kim EH, Kim N, Jang SY. Functional failure after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: Analysis of causes and management. PLoS One 2019; 14(12): e0227073.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227073

13. Shams PN, Olver JM. Management of functional epiphora due to punctal laxity: role of the lateral tarsal strip procedure. JAMA Ophthalmol 2014; 132(1): 109–113.

https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.5011

14. Tsirbas A, Wormald PJ. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flaps. Am J Ophthalmol 2003; 135(1): 76–83.

https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(02)01813-4

15. Eloy P, Bertrand B, Martinez M, Hoebeke M, Watelet JB. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: indications, technique and results. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 1995; 49(3): 271–276.

16. Naik MN, Honavar SG, Rath S. Transcanalicular diode laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy: outcome in 118 patients. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 24(4): 241–245.

https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0b013e31817c894e

17. Ali MJ, Psaltis AJ, Wormald PJ. Long-term outcomes in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: Primary and revision surgeries. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2014; 42(7): 665–671.

https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.12332

18. Wang K, Chen R, Liu S. Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting the need for concomitant endoscopic septoplasty during endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for chronic dacryocystitis with moderate nasal septum deviation. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2024; 14(10): 3848–3860.

https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-24-726

19. Prinja S, Dhanoa S, Singh G. A comparative study of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with and without stenting. Acta Medica Int 2023; 10(2): 96–101.

https://doi.org/10.4103/amit.amit_75_23

Downloads

Published

30-01-2026

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Categories

How to Cite

1.
Awan AA, Naqvi SAZ, Rafique A, Yasin UU, Butt WR, Naqvi SAH. Success Rate of Combined Transcanalicular Diode Laser and Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy in Patients of Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction. Pak Armed Forces Med J [Internet]. 2026 Jan. 30 [cited 2026 Feb. 6];76(SUPPL-1):S244-S248. Available from: https://www.pafmj.org/PAFMJ/article/view/13929