Comparison of Working Length Loss In Manual Versus Rotary (Waveone) Preparation In Curved Canals; A Quasi-Experimental Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v74i1.6954Keywords:
Endodontic instruments, Dentists, Dental instruments, Root canal preparation, Endodontics, Root canal therapy, WaveOneAbstract
Objective: To compare the consistency of working length control in hand instrumentation and engine-driven rotary files Wave
One by comparing their pre and post-instrumentation working lengths.
Study Design: Quasi-experimental study.
Place and Duration of Study: Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, Rawalpindi Pakistan, from Jun to Dec 2019.
Methodology: A total of 90 mandibular first molars were selected. Two groups were drawn with 45 mesio buccal canals each. The First-Group was prepared with manual K-files, whereas the second group had rotary instrumentation using the WaveOne system. Pre and post-preparation working lengths were noted.
Results: The mean pre-operative (18.5±1.03mm) and post-operative (18.15±1.09mm) working lengths of manually prepared and WaveOne prepared canals (18.8±3.43mm and 18.7±3.25mm respectively) presented statistically significant loss of postoperative working lengths. The comparison of the two groups gives a statistically significant result in manual preparation,
showing a greater loss of working length as compared to canals prepared with WaveOne rotary files.
Conclusion: Manual instrumentation causes a greater loss of working length by straightening the canal more than enginedriven WaveOne rotary files postoperatively.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North
Am 1974; 18(2): 269-296.
Venino PM, Citterio CL, Pellegatta A, Ciccarelli M, Maddalone
M. A Micro-computed Tomography Evaluation of the Shaping
Ability of Two Nickel-titanium Instruments, HyFlex EDM and
ProTaper Next. J Endod 2017; 43(4): 628-632.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2016.11.022
Troiano G, Dioguardi M, Cocco A, Giannatempo G, Laino L,
Ciavarella D, et al. Influence of Operator's Experience on the
Shaping Ability of Protaper Universal and Waveone Systems: A
Comparative Study on Simulated Root Canals. Open Dent J 2016;
: 546-552. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601610010546
DeCleen MJ. The relationship between the root canal filling and
post space preparation. Int Endod J 1993; 26(1): 53-58.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1993.tb00542.x
Thampibul P, Jantarat J, Arayasantiparb R. Post-treatment apical
periodontitis related to the technical quality of root fillings and
restorations in Thai population. Aust Endod J 2019; 45(2): 163-
https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12302
De-Deus G, César-de-Azevedo-Carvalhal J, Belladonna FG, Silva
EJNL, Lopes RT, Moreira-Filho RE, et al. Dentinal Microcrack
Development after Canal Preparation: A Longitudinal in Situ
Micro-computed Tomography Study Using a Cadaver Model. J
Endod 2017; 43(9): 1553-1558.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.04.027
Saber SE, Nagy MM, Schäfer E. Comparative evaluation of the
shaping ability of WaveOne, Reciproc and OneShape single-file
systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int
Endod J 2015; 48(1): 109-114. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12289
Ahmad H. Assessment of root canal working length employing
manual and rotary instrumentation technique. An inVitro study.
Pak J Med Dent 2018; 12(7): 13-17.
Krajczár K, Varga E, Marada G, Jeges S, Tóth V. Comparison of
working length control consistency between hand K-files and
Mtwo NiTi rotary system. J Clin Exp Dent 2016; 8(2): e136-40.
https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.52561
Balani P, Niazi F, Rashid H. A brief review of methods used to
determine the curvature of root canals. J Rest Dent 2015; 4(3); 57-
Serefoglu B, Piskin B. Micro computed tomography evaluation of
the Self-adjusting file and ProTaper Universal system on curved
mandibular molars. Dent Mater J 2017; 36(5): 606-613.
https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2016-255
Caldwell JL. Change in working length following
instrumentation of molar canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
; 41(1): 114-118. https//doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(76)90260-7.
Tien M, Tjoa H, Zhou M, Abbott PV. Comparative Study of Four
Endodontic File Systems to Assess Changes in Working Length
during Root Canal Instrumentation and the Effect of Canal
Curvature on Working Length Change. J Endod 2020; 46(1): 110-
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2019.10.004
Tabassum S, Khan F. Failure of endodontic treatment: The usual
suspects. Eur J Dent 2016; 10(01): 144-147.
https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.175682
Estrela C, Couto G, Bueno M, Bueno K, Estrela L, Porto O, et al.
Apical Foramen Position in Relation to Proximal Root Surfaces of
Human Permanent Teeth Determined by Using a New Conebeam Computed Tomographic Software. J. Endod 2018; 44(11):
-1748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.07.028
Ruiz-Sánchez C, Faus-Llácer V, Faus-Matoses I, ZubizarretaMacho Á, Sauro S, Faus-Matoses V. The Influence of NiTi Alloy
on the Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Endodontic Files. J Clin Med
; 9(11): 3755. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9113755
Walia HM, Brantley WA, Gerstein H. An initial investigation of
the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J
Endod 1988; 14(7): 346-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0099-
(88)80196-1
Manchanda S, Sardana D, Yiu CKY. A systematic review and
meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing rotary
canal instrumentation techniques with manual instrumentation
techniques in primary teeth. Int Endod J 2020; 53(3): 333-353.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
