Diagnostic Accuracy of FAST Scan in Hemodynamically Stable Blunt Abdominal Injury Patients; Is it "Fast" enough?

Authors

  • Sadaf Aziz Department of Radiology, Combined Military Hospital, Multan/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Yasser Khan Department of Radiology, Combined Military Hospital, Multan/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Lubaina Awais Department of Radiology, Temar Diagnostics, Islamabad Pakistan
  • Iram Mohsin Department of Radiology, Combined Military Hospital, Multan/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Meena Azeem Department of Radiology, Combined Military Hospital, Peshawar/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Faiza Zahoor Department of Radiology, Combined Military Hospital, Peshawar/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v73i5.8511

Keywords:

Blunt abdominal injury, Computerized Tomography, FAST scan, Ultrasound

Abstract

Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of a Focused Assessment with Sonography for Injury (FAST) scan in blunt
abdominal injury with suspected hollow viscus organ perforation, keeping a computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen as a reference.

Study Design: Cross-sectional study.

Place and Duration of Study: Radiology Department, Combined Military Hospital, Peshawar Pakistan, from Aug 2017 to Feb 2018.

Methodology: One hundred forty-seven hemodynamically stable patients aged 20-60 years of either gender presenting in the Emergency Department (ED) with clinical suspicion of blunt abdominal injury were included. FAST scan and CT abdomen
reporting were done by two separate consultants blinded to each other.

Results: The mean age was 35.84±8.44 years, ranging from 21-60 years. Among 72 FAST-positive patients, 68(46.3%) were true positive, and 4(2.7%) were false positive. Among 75 FAST negative patients, 6(4.1%) were false negative, and 69(46.9%) were true negative. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of FAST compared to CT was 91.89%, 94.52%, 94.44% and 92.00%, respectively; FAST scan was correct in 93.20%.

Conclusions: FAST Ultrasound is a sensitive and specific tool in the screening and diagnosing of abdominal injury resulting
from blunt abdominal injury.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

30-10-2023

How to Cite

Aziz, S., Khan, Y., Awais, L., Mohsin, I., Azeem, M., & Zahoor, F. (2023). Diagnostic Accuracy of FAST Scan in Hemodynamically Stable Blunt Abdominal Injury Patients; Is it "Fast" enough?. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, 73(5), 1452–1455. https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v73i5.8511

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)