Compliance of Early Feeding As A Part of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols in Patients After Gastrointestinal Surgeries

Authors

  • Usman Ghani Department of General Surgery, Combined Military Hospital Rawalpindi/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Muhammad Qasim Butt Department of General Surgery, Army Liver Transplant unit/ Pak Emirates Military Hospital Rawalpindi/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Javaid Iqbal Department of General Surgery, Combined Military Hospital Rawalpindi/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Javed Iqbal Khan Department of General Surgery, DHQ Teaching Hospital Haripur Pakistan
  • Qazi Tafheem ul Haq Department of General Surgery, Combined Military Hospital Rawalpindi/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Tayyaba Usman Department of Gynecology, Female and Children Hospital MTI Gomal Medical University D I Khan Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v76iSUPPL-2.8639

Keywords:

Compliance; Early feeding; Gastrointestinal surgery

Abstract

Objective: To assess the compliance of early feeding as a part of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols in patients after gastrointestinal surgeries and factors related with poor compliance

Study Design: Comparative Cross-sectional Study

Place and Duration of Study: Surgical Department Combined Military Hospital Rawalpindi, Pakistan from May 2021 to Apr 2022.

Methodology: A prospective study was conducted on 95 patients undergoing different types of gastrointestinal surgeries at surgical unit of CMH RWP during the study period. All the patients were started with early feeding as a part of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols. They were observed for 72 hours for presence of poor tolerability or non-compliance. Relationship of relevant socio-demographic factors was assessed with poor tolerability of early feeding.

Results: A total of 95 patients with gastrointestinal surgeries performed during the study period were included in the study. All of them were given early feeding as a part of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols. Out of 95, 73(76.8%) had good compliance and tolerability to early feeding while 22(23.1%) patients had one or more non-tolerability parameters within 48 hours of surgery. Advancing age, raised total leucocyte count and presence of comorbid illness had statistically significant relationship with non-tolerability of early feeding (p-value<0.05).

Conclusion: Most of the patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgeries showed good compliance and tolerability to early feeding as a part of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols. Elderly patients, patients with comorbid medical problems or those with high post-operative total leucocyte count were found more at risk....

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

need for surgery worldwide based on prevalence of diseases: a modelling strategy for the WHO Global Health Estimate. Lancet Glob Health 2015; 3 Suppl 2(Suppl 2): S13-20.https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(15)70087-2

2. Simões CM, Carmona MJC, Hajjar LA, Vincent JL, Landoni G, Belletti A, et al. Predictors of major complications after elective abdominal surgery in cancer patients. BMC Anesthesiol 2018; 18(1): 49.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0516-6

3. Gillespie BM, Harbeck EL, Sandy-Hodgetts K, Rattray M, Thalib L, Patel B, et al. Incidence of wound dehiscence in patients undergoing laparoscopy or laparotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Wound Care 2023; 32(Sup8a): S31-S43.

https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2023.32.sup8a.s31

4. Eleftheriadis K, Davies R. Do patients fed enterally post-gastrointestinal surgery experience more complications when fed a fiber-enriched feed compared with a standard feed? A systematic review. Nutr Clin Pract 2021; 12(1): 29.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.10805

5. Brusasco C, Cucciolini G, Barberis A, Introini C, Campodonico F, Corradi F. Improving Patient Outcomes in Abdominal Surgery. J Clin Med 2024; 13(7): 1993.

https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13071993

6. Secombe P, Harley S, Chapman M, Aromataris E. Feeding the critically ill obese patient: a systematic review protocol. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep 2015; 13(10): 95-109.

https://doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2458

7. Herbert G, Perry R, Andersen HK, Atkinson C, Penfold C, Lewis SJ, et al. Early enteral nutrition within 24 hours of lower gastrointestinal surgery versus later commencement for length of hospital stay and postoperative complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 7(7): CD004080.

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004080.pub4

8. Charoenkwan K, Matovinovic E. Early versus delayed oral fluids and food for reducing complications after major abdominal gynaecologic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 2014(12): CD004508.

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd004508.pub4

9. Zhang K, Cheng S, Zhu Q, Han Z. Early versus traditional postoperative oral feeding in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of safety and efficacy. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 2017; 20(9): 1060-1066.

10. Khan AI, Masood N, Ilyas U, Raza Z, Khan J. Comparative analysis of early versus late enteral feeding after gastrointestinal surgeries. Pak J Med Health Sci 2021; 15(8): 2050‐2053.

https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs211582050

11. Nematihonar B, Yazdani A, Falahinejadghajari R, Mirkheshti A. Early postoperative oral feeding shortens first time of bowel evacuation and prevents long term hospital stay in patients undergoing elective small intestine anastomosis. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench 2019; 12(1): 25-30.

12. Kaibori M, Miyata G, Yoshii K, Fukushima R. Perioperative management for gastrointestinal surgery after instituting interventions initiated by the Japanese Society of Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition. Asian J Surg 2020; 43(1): 124-129.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2019.02.007

13. Weimann A, Braga M, Carli F, Higashiguchi T, Hübner M, Klek S, et al. ESPEN guideline: Clinical nutrition in surgery. Clin Nutr 201; 36(3): 623-650.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2017.02.013

14. Yamada T, Wakabayashi M, Yamaji T, Chopra N, Mikami T, Miyashita H et al. Value of leukocytosis and elevated C-reactive protein in predicting severe coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Chim Acta 2020; 509: 235-243.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2020.06.008

15. Klappenbach RF, Yazyi FJ, Alonso Quintas F, Horna ME, Alvarez Rodríguez J, Oría A. Early oral feeding versus traditional postoperative care after abdominal emergency surgery: a randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 2013; 37(10): 2293-2299.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2143-1

16. Hao T, Liu Q, Lv X, Qiu J, Zhang HR, Jiang HP. Efficacy and safety of early oral feeding in postoperative patients with upper gastrointestinal tumor: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 13(7): 717-733.

https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v13.i7.717

17. Ahmed M, Mehboob M, Ahmed F, Babar KM, Iqbal M, Qureshi SA. Comparison of Early Versus Late Oral Feeding After Elective Stoma Closure. J Surg Pak 2019; 24(4): 166-170.

18. Andersen HK, Lewis SJ, Thomas S. Early enteral nutrition within 24h of colorectal surgery versus later commencement of feeding for postoperative complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (4): CD004080.

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd004080.pub2

Downloads

Published

30-03-2026

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

1.
Ghani U, Butt MQ, Iqbal J, Khan JI, Haq QT ul, Usman T. Compliance of Early Feeding As A Part of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols in Patients After Gastrointestinal Surgeries. Pak Armed Forces Med J [Internet]. 2026 Mar. 30 [cited 2026 Apr. 5];76(SUPPL-2):S393-S396. Available from: https://www.pafmj.org/PAFMJ/article/view/8639