Clinical Audit on the Quality of Pre-Anaesthesia Assessment based on Predefined Pre-anaesthesia Assessment Form

Authors

  • Khalid Mahmood Department of Anesthesia, Combined Military Hospital, Sialkot/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Muhammad Ali Abbas Department of Anesthesia, Combined Military Hospital, Pano Aqil/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Bilal Yasin Department of Anesthesia, Combined Military Hospital, Okara/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Muhammad Saeed Department of Anesthesia, Combined Military Hospital, Nowshera/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Mohsin Saleem Department of Anesthesia, Combined Military Hospital, Sialkot/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Saleha Sarfraz Department of Anesthesia, Combined Military Hospital, Sialkot/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v74i1.8681

Keywords:

Anaesthesia, Assessment form global quality index, Predefined pre-anaesthesia

Abstract

Objective: To determine the percentage completion of individual GQI indicators and the overall percentage of completed predefined Pre-anaesthesia assessment forms and identify any areas for improvement in the documentation of pre-anaesthesia assessment.

Study Design: Cross-sectional study.

Place and Duration of Study: Department of Anaesthesiology, Combined Military Hospital, Sialkot Pakistan, from Mar to Sep 2021.

Methodology: Patients who reported to the operation theatre during the study period for elective surgery after having undergone formal pre-anaesthesia assessment preoperatively based on predefined Pre-anaesthesia assessment form (PAAF) were included. The quality of Pre-anaesthesia assessments from completion was assessed using a modified Global Quality Index with twenty-seven components.

Results: The overall completion rate for all pre-anaesthesia assessment form components was 77.10±30.26%. The lowest completed items were local examination (0.00%), airway assessment, neck mobility, mouth opening, thyromental distance (24,10.61%), weight (25, 11.36%), GIT (86, 38.64%) and CNS/GCS (108, 48.48%) assessment, pre-operative vitals (121, 54.55%) and family history (129, 58.33%).

Conclusion: We need to improve the quality of pre-anaesthesia assessment forms at our institution by ensuring that all relevant information is collected and documented.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Indra I, Kulsum K. Pre-Anesthesia Assessment and Preparation.

Bp Int Res Exact Sci 2020; 2(2): 228-235.

https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v3i2.977.

American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on

Preanesthesia Evaluation. Practice Advisory for Preanesthesia

Evaluation: A Report by the American Society of

Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preanesthesia Evaluation. J Am,

Soci, Anesth 2002; 96(2): 485-496.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200202000-00037.

Tobias JD. Preoperative anesthesia evaluation. Semin Pediatr

Surg 2018; 27(2): 67-74.

https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2018.02.002.

Omole OB, Torlutter M, Akii AJ. Preanaesthetic assessment and

management in the context of the district hospital. S Afr fam

pract. 2021; 63(1) : e1-e7.

https://doi.org/10.4102/safp.v63i1.5357.

Santos ML, Novaes CO, Iglesias AC. [Epidemiological profile of

patients seen in the pre-anesthetic assessment clinic of a

university hospital]. Rev Bras Anestesiol 2017; 67(5): 457-467.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjan.2016.06.002.

Almeshari M, Khalifa M, El-Metwally A, Househ M, Alanazi A.

Quality and accuracy of electronic pre-anesthesia evaluation

forms. Comput Meth Programs Biomed 2018; 160: 51-56.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.03.006.

Sobrie O, Lazouni MEA, Mahmoudi S, Mousseau V, Pirlot M. A

new decision support model for preanesthetic evaluation.

Comput Meth Programs Biomed 2016; 133: 183-193.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.05.021.

Vetter TR, Boudreaux AM, Ponce BA, Barman J, Crump SJ.

Development of a preoperative patient clearance and

consultation screening questionnaire. Anesth Analg 2016; 123(6):

-1457. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000001532.

Kluger M, Tham E, Coleman N, Runciman W, Bullock M.

Inadequate pre‐operative evaluation and preparation: a review

of 197 reports from the Australian Incident Monitoring Study.

Anaesthesia 2000; 55(12): 1173-1178.

https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01725.x.

Shah S, Hariharan U, Chawla R. Integrating perioperative

medicine with anaesthesia in India: Can the best be achieved? A

review. Indian J Anaesth 2019; 63(5): 338.

https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.258058.

Aronson S, Westover J, Guinn N, Setji T, Wischmeyer P, Gulur P,

et al. A perioperative medicine model for population health: an

integrated approach for an evolving clinical science. Anesth

Analg 2018; 126(2): 682-690.

https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002606.

Turbitt L, Mariano E, El‐Boghdadly K. Future directions in

regional anaesthesia: not just for the cognoscenti. Anaesthesia

; 75(3): 293-297. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14768.

Shahzad S, Younas T. Clinical audit on quality of preanesthesia

evaluation. Anaesth Pain Intensiv 2021; 25(1): 15-20.

https://doi.org/10.35975/apic.v25i1.1429.

Mokgwathi GT, Baloyi B, Ogunbanjo G. An audit of preoperative

evaluation of general surgery patients at Dr George Mukhari

Hospital. South Afr J Anaesth Analg 2011; 17(2): 177-180.

Downloads

Published

28-02-2024

How to Cite

Mahmood, K., Muhammad Ali Abbas, Bilal Yasin, Muhammad Saeed, Mohsin Saleem, & Saleha Sarfraz. (2024). Clinical Audit on the Quality of Pre-Anaesthesia Assessment based on Predefined Pre-anaesthesia Assessment Form. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, 74(1), 211–215. https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v74i1.8681

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>