Agreement between Subjective and Objective Parameters Using Meibography for Assessment of Dry Eye Syndrome

Authors

  • Ijlal Taimoor Department of Ophthalmology, Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Syed Abid Hassan Naqvi Department of Ophthalmology, Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Taimoor Ashraf Khan Department of Ophthalmology, Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Saquib Naeem Department of Ophthalmology, Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Waseem Yousaf Department of Ophthalmology, Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Muhammad Usman Ghani Department of Ophthalmology, Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v73iSUPPL-2.9858

Keywords:

Computerized grading system,, Dry eye disease, Meibography, Objective grading system, Subjective grading system

Abstract

Objective: To determine the agreement between subjective and objective parameters using meibography.

Study Design: Cross-sectional observational study.

Place and Duration of Study: Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology (AFIO), Rawalpindi Pakistan from August 2021 till
February 2022.

Methodology: 100 patients were included in the study. Non-contact infra-red meibography was performed on each patient. Subjective assessment was done using the four-grade and five-grade scales while objective assessment was done by applying computerized grading.

Results: A total of one hundred (n=100) patients participated in the study. Out of total, 60% patients were male and 40% were females, with a mean age 42.25±14.9 years. There was statistically significant difference was seen Session I OII vs Session II OII as p-value <0.001 in Grade-4, Session-I OIII vs Session-II OIII as p-value <0.001 in Grade-5. There was not statistically significant difference seen in Computerized Grading (100-grade scale) as p-value >0.05. Correlations between observers was best with the 5-grade scale followed by the computerized 100-grade scale and 4-grade scale.

Conclusions: We found that the reliability of the 5-grade scale was poorer to that of the 4-grade scales. We also concluded that computerized grading offers a better intra and inter-observer assessment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

28-07-2023

How to Cite

Taimoor, I., Naqvi, S. A. H., Khan, T. A., Naeem, S., Yousaf, W., & Ghani, M. U. (2023). Agreement between Subjective and Objective Parameters Using Meibography for Assessment of Dry Eye Syndrome. Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, 73(SUPPL-2), S374–77. https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v73iSUPPL-2.9858

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 > >>