Comparison of Outcome After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with Drainage Vs No Drainage

Authors

  • Tariq Kamal Department of Surgery, Combined Military Hospital Rawalpindi/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Khurram Sarfaraz Department of Surgery, Combined Military Hospital Rawalpindi/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Faheem Ullah Naz Department of Surgery, Combined Military Hospital Rawalpindi/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Abdul Jabbar Khaskheli Department of Surgery, Combined Military Hospital Rawalpindi/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Mahlail Hasan Khan Department of Surgery, Combined Military Hospital Rawalpindi/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Rukh-E-Zanib Aftab Department of Surgery, Combined Military Hospital Rawalpindi/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v75iSUPPL-5.8093

Keywords:

Complications; Drain; laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Abstract

Objective: To compare the outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy with drainage vs no drainage

Study Design: Comparative Cross-sectional Study

Setting and Duration of Study: Combined Military Hospital Rawalpindi, Pakistan Feb 2021 to Nov 2021

Methodology: A prospective study was conducted on 500 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystitis secondary to gall stones during the study period. Patients were divided into two groups on the basis of lottery method. Drain was not placed in patients in group A while it was placed in patients in group B. Both the groups were followed up for ten days for presence of complications like pain, port site infection, bleeding and bile leakage.

Results: Out of 500 patients included in the final analysis 167(33.4%) were male and 333(66.6%) were female. Mean age of patients put who underwent laparoscopic surgery for cholelithiasis leading to cholecystitis in our study was 42.78±9.776 years. 269(53.8%) patients did not receive drain after the surgery while 231(46.2%) received the drain. Pearson chi-square test revealed that bleeding and port site infection occurred statistically significantly more in patients receiving drain (p-value<0.05) while pain and bile leakage did not show any such difference in both the groups (p-value>0.05).

Conclusion: Routine use of drain after cholecystectomy emerged counter therapeutic in our study as patients which had drain in place had more chances of bleeding and port site infection as compared to those in which there was no drain in place. Other complications like pain and bile leakage occurred independent of drain use or no use.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Vitale A, Lai Q. New trends and perspectives in hepatobiliary surgery: preface.Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018; 3: 99. Published 2018. https://doi:10.21037/tgh.2018.11.06

2. Artifon EL, Loureiro JF, Baron TH, Fernandes K, Kahaleh M, Marson FP. Surgery or EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy for malignant distal biliary obstruction after ERCP failure.Endosc Ultrasound. 2015; 4(3): 235-43.

3. Hong KS, Noh KT, Min SK, Lee HK. Selection of surgical treatment types for intrahepatic duct stones.Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2011; 15(3): 139-45.

4. Yunus M, Ghani Z, Ch IM, Akram A. Evaluation of basic surgical skill workshop at undergraduate level in the discipline of surgery.Pak J Med Sci. 2020; 36(4): 609-614. https://doi:10.12669/pjms.36.4.1792

5. Picchio M, De Cesare A, Di Filippo A, Spaziani M, Spaziani E. Prophylactic drainage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Updates Surg. 2019; 71(2): 247-254.

https://doi: 10.1007/s13304-019-00648-x.

6. Xu M, Tao YL. Drainage versus No Drainage after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: A Meta-Analysis. Am Surg. 2019; 85(1): 86-91.

7. Sharma A, Gupta SN. Drainage versus no Drainage after Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2016; 14(53): 69-72.

8. Cirocchi R, Kwan SH, Popivanov G, Ruscelli P, Lancia M, Gioia S, et al. Routine drain or no drain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Surgeon. 2021; 19(3): 167-174.

https://doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2020.04.011.

9. Yang SC, Chang KY, Wei LF, Shyr YM, Ho CM. To drain or not to drain: the association between residual intraperitoneal gas and post-laparoscopic shoulder pain for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1): 7447. Published 2021 Jun 1. https://doi:10.1038/s41598-021-85714-4

10. Bilal M, Aslam V, Din ZU, Jan W, Inamullah, Khan S, et al. Post-procedural Drainage versus no Drainage in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy at DHQ Hospital Charsadda, Pakistan. J Islamabad Med Dental Coll. 2021; 10(2): 105-109. https://doi:10.35787/jimdc.v10i2.554

11. Qiu J, Li M. Nondrainage after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Calculous Cholecystitis Does Not Increase the Postoperative Morbidity. Biomed Res Int. 2018; 2018: 8436749. Published 2018. https://doi:10.1155/2018/8436749

12. Hassler KR, Collins JT, Philip K, Jones MW. Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. 2021 Sep 28. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021.

13. Sharma A, Mittal S. Role of Routine Subhepatic Abdominal Drain Placement following Uncomplicated Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Randomised Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016; 10(12): PC03-PC05. https://doi:10.7860/JCDR/2016/21142.8983

14. Alexander HC, Bartlett AS, Wells CI, Hannam JA, Moore MR, Poole GH, Merry AF. Reporting of complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review. HPB (Oxford). 2018; 20(9): 786-794. https://doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.03.004.

15. Park JS, Kim JH, Kim JK, Yoon DS. The role of abdominal drainage to prevent of intra-abdominal complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2015; 29(2): 453-7.

https://doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3685-5.

16. Yang J, Liu Y, Yan P, Tian H, Jing W, Si M, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with and without abdominal drainage in patients with non-complicated benign gallbladder disease: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020; 99(20): e20070.

https://doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020070.

17. Kim EY, Lee SH, Lee JS, Yoon YC, Park SK, Choi HJ, et al. Is routine drain insertion after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis beneficial? A multicenter, prospective randomized controlled trial. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015; 22(7): 551-7. https://doi: 10.1002/jhbp.244.

18. Valappil MV, Gulati S, Chhabra M, Mandal A, Bakshi S, Bhattacharyya A, et al. Drain in laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute calculous cholecystitis: a randomised controlled study. Postgrad Med J. 2020; 96(1140): 606-609.

https://doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2019-136828.

Downloads

Published

31-07-2025

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

1.
Kamal T, Sarfaraz K, Naz FU, Khaskheli AJ, Khan MH, Aftab R-E-Z. Comparison of Outcome After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with Drainage Vs No Drainage. Pak Armed Forces Med J [Internet]. 2025 Jul. 31 [cited 2025 Aug. 1];75(SUPPL-5):S697-S700. Available from: https://www.pafmj.org/PAFMJ/article/view/8093