Efficacy of Erector Spinae Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Post Operative Pain Control After Laparoscopic Cholecystectom

Authors

  • Fahad Hasnain Department of Anesthesia, Combined Military Hospital/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Munim Saeed Department of Anesthesia, Combined Military Hospital/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Syed Qasim Ali Shah Department of Anesthesia, Combined Military Hospital/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Sajjad Qureshi Department of Anesthesia, Combined Military Hospital, Quetta/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Pakistan
  • Muhammad Mohsin Riaz Department of Anesthesia, Combined Military Hospital/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi Pakistan
  • Muhammad Huzaifa Shareef Department of Anesthesia, Combined Military Hospital/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS) Rawalpindi Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v75i2.9456

Keywords:

Analgesia, Erector Spinae block, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Transversus abdominis block

Abstract

Objective: To compare post-operative analgesic efficacy of ultrasound guided erector spinae block versus transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Study Design: Quasi-experimental study.

Place and Duration of Study: Department of Anesthesia, Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi Pakistan, from May to Oct 2022.

Methodology: Our patients were divided into erector spinae block Group (Group ESP) (n=20) and transversus abdominis plane block Group (Group TAP) (n=20). After the surgery, before extubating, a consultant anesthetist with at least 5 years of regional block experience, performed the blocks in selected patients under ultrasound guidance following standard techniques and protocols.

Results: Duration of surgery between both Groups was comparable, with a mean time of 128.5±5.1 minutes in the ESP versus 127.3±5.7 minutes in the TAP Group (p=0.13). However, time to first rescue analgesia was significantly increased in ESP Group at 238.5±5.1 minutes versus 174.1±6.0 minutes in TAP Group (p=0.0001). Consequently, total analgesia requirement was also significantly decreased in ESP Group with 4.6±0.5 mg in 24 hours versus 8.2±0.9 mg in 24 hours in TAP Group (p=0.0001). Mean HDU stay was also decreased significantly between ESP and TAP Group, being 27.8± 2.3 hours versus 44.25±5.5 hours (p=0.0001).

Conclusion: ESP block provides superior analgesia, good adverse effect profile, early mobilization and decreased hospital stay when compared to TAP block for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Whitfield N. A revolution through the keyhole: Technology, innovation, and the rise of minimally invasive surgery. The Palgrave Handbook of the History of Surgery 2018: 525-548.

Byer A. The Origins of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery and Their Impact on Surgical Practice: A Sociological, Technological History. In: Robotic Surgery. Springer; 2021: 11-20.

Sanghvi RK. Comparative analysis of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A comparative study. Int J Surg 2021; 5(4): 212-215.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105876

Pateriya A, Agrawal MP, Samar SK. Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study on patient parameters. Int Surg J 2021; 8(6): 1767-1771.

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20212379

Farda W, Tani MK, Manning RG. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: review of 1430 cases in Cure International Hospital, Kabul, Afghanistan. BMC Surg 2021; 21(1): 1-8.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01234-y

Jesus RRd, Leite AM, Leite SS. Anesthetic therapy for acute pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: systematic review. Rev Col Bras Cir 2018; 45: e1906.

https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6991e-20181906

O'Driscoll L. Implementation of an Education Program for an Ultrasound-Guided Liposomal Bupivacaine Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block Protocol for Open Abdominal Procedures. AANA J 2018; 86(6): 439-445.

Peltrini R, Cantoni V, Green R. Efficacy of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 2020; 24(8): 787-802.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02209-6

Luis-Navarro JC, Seda-Guzmán M, Luis-Moreno C. Erector spinae plane block in abdominal surgery: case series. Indian J Anaesth 2018; 62(7): 549-554.

https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_431_18

Tsui BC, Fonseca A, Munshey F. The erector spinae plane (ESP) block: a pooled review of 242 cases. J Clin Anesth 2019; 53: 29-34.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.09.036

Routray SS, Mohanty R, Pradhan K. Evaluation of efficacy of ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block and oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy 2020.

Elsharkawy H, Bendtsen TF. Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane and Quadratus Lumborum Nerve Blocks. NYSORA 2021.

Aygun H, Ozturk NK, Pamukcu AS. Comparison of ultrasound guided Erector Spinae Plane Block and quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients; a prospective randomized study. J Clin Anesth 2020; 62: 109696.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109696

Boules ML, Goda AS, Abdelhady MA. Comparison of analgesic effect between erector spinae plane block and transversus abdominis plane block after elective cesarean section: a prospective randomized single-blind controlled study. J Pain Res 2020; 13: 1073-1080.

https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S246202

Elshazly M, El-Halafawy YM, Mohamed DZ. The Feasibility and Efficacy of erector spinae plane block versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block In Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: A Randomized Comparative Trial. Korean J Anesthesiol 2022; 75(4): 350-357.

https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.21475

Venkatraman R, Saravanan R, Dhas M. Comparison of laparoscopy-guided with ultrasound-guided subcostal transversus abdominis plane block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy–A prospective, randomised study. Indian J Anaesth 2020; 64(12): 1012-1017.

https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_683_20

Ghulam SAL, Banoo F, Summaira Jan R. Ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block versus transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia in patient undergoing cesarean section: A randomized controlled study. Eur J Mol Clin Med 2022; 9(3): 1303-1312.

Pourkashanian A, Narayanan M, Venkataraju A. The erector spinae plane block: a review of current evidence. Update Anaesth 2020; 35:27-33.

Entzeroth TR, Wolpers JS. Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks Versus Erector Spinae Plane Blocks: Reducing Opioid Consumption Postoperatively for Colorectal Surgery (Doctoral dissertation, Webster University).

Downloads

Published

29-04-2025

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

1.
Hasnain F, Saeed M, Shah SQA, Riaz MM, Shareef MH. Efficacy of Erector Spinae Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Post Operative Pain Control After Laparoscopic Cholecystectom. Pak Armed Forces Med J [Internet]. 2025 Apr. 29 [cited 2025 May 1];75(2):277-80. Available from: https://www.pafmj.org/PAFMJ/article/view/9456